Police free journalists taken from newsrooms after Shah ordered it, his aide says
Press Council Nepal says officers showed no warrant or court order, and even the ruling party's spokesman condemned the raids.

Police released the journalists on Friday evening, hours after officers pulled them out of their own newsrooms in Kathmandu, after Prime Minister Balen Shah ordered them freed, his press adviser said.
This is about your right to know. The Rastriya Swatantra Party, or RSP, which leads Shah's government, itself said any attack on press freedom strikes at every citizen's right to be informed, OnlineKhabar reported. Press Council Nepal says complaints about news belong with the council, not the police.
Plainclothes officers from the Cyber Bureau and a police crime investigation office, OnlineKhabar reported, took Bishwamani Subedi of Nepal Press, Shobhraj Baral, chairman and editor-in-chief of Motivate News, and Dhiraj Basnet of DN Khabar from their newsrooms on Friday, October 30. Setopati reported police arrested those three and were searching for at least three more. Police teams also went to the offices of Naya Patrika and Diyo Post asking about journalists, Setopati reported.
Deepa Dahal, the prime minister's press adviser, said on social media that Shah had expressed concern over police entering media offices and had ordered the authorities to stop the raids and free everyone held, OnlineKhabar English reported. She said the prime minister, his secretariat and his office had no involvement and no advance knowledge of the operation, DC Nepal reported.
Communications Minister Bikram Timilsina wrote on Facebook that all detained journalists had been released and that the government is fully committed to press freedom, Nepal Press reported.
Subedi, after his release, told Nepal Press that a superintendent from the Valley Crime Investigation Bureau called him in for "tea" before taking him into custody, and called the police's conduct immature and regrettable. His long trust in the police, he said, had been shaken.
Press Council Nepal, the body legally responsible for handling complaints about published news, said police never showed an arrest warrant, never stated a clear reason, and showed no sign of having court permission, OnlineKhabar reported. Nepal Bar Association president Dr. Bijay Prasad Mishra said police entering newsrooms to detain reporters "gives a flashback of the royal regime," a reference to 2005, when King Gyanendra sent troops into media houses and imposed censorship after seizing direct power. The Federation of Nepali Journalists' general secretary, Ram Prasad Dahal, called the raids state terror.
Congress president Gagan Thapa, UML general secretary Shankar Pokhrel, and Jagdish Kharel, the RSP's spokesperson, all condemned the raids, OnlineKhabar reported. Kharel said arresting a journalist over a news story is "in neither our party's policy nor its principle."
What the coverage missed
OnlineKhabar reported, citing people close to the prime minister, that the operation was run not by Shah's office but by Police Inspector General Dan Bahadur Karki, targeting journalists who had written critical coverage of him. The outlet also cited unnamed "high-level sources" claiming Karki told subordinates the raids were on the prime minister and home minister's instruction, a claim the prime minister's office denies. Neither version is independently confirmed.
Nepal Gen-Z Front, the movement whose uprising helped bring Shah's government to power, said in a statement reported by Setopati that a government born of that uprising's demand for accountability had acted against its own mandate, and called on Shah and Home Minister Sudhan Gurung to take political and moral responsibility, and for Karki to be investigated.
What we still do not know
- Who ordered the raids: the prime minister's office denies it, unnamed sources blame IGP Karki, and neither Karki nor the Home Ministry has said so on the record.
- Under what law the journalists were held: Press Council Nepal says no warrant or court order was shown, and police have not explained its legal basis.
- Whether the government will act on Gen-Z Front's demand to investigate IGP Karki: only the Ministry of Home Affairs or the prime minister's secretariat can answer that.
Get stories like this every morning
One free email with the day's checked stories, each with what the coverage missed.
Sources
- OnlineKhabar (Nepali) · Names and outlets of the detained journalists; party reactions from RSP, Congress, UML and the Nepali Communist Party
- OnlineKhabar (Nepali) · Press Council Nepal's statement on the lack of a warrant or court permission, and that complaints about published news belong with the council; Nepal Bar Association and Federation of Nepali Journalists reaction
- OnlineKhabar (Nepali) · Nepali Congress president Gagan Thapa's statement
- OnlineKhabar (Nepali) · Account alleging IGP Dan Bahadur Karki ran the operation and invoked the PM and home minister's names; that officers came from the Cyber Bureau and a crime investigation office; royal-era comparison and historical detail
- OnlineKhabar (Nepali) · Ruling party RSP's official statement condemning the raids and calling any attack on press freedom a strike against every citizen's right to be informed
- Setopati · Nepal Gen-Z Front's demand that PM Shah and Home Minister Gurung take responsibility and that IGP Karki be investigated; report that police teams went to Naya Patrika and Diyo Post asking about journalists
- Setopati · via Google News · Report that a plainclothes police team went to Naya Patrika's office
- Setopati · via Google News · Report that police went to Diyo Post's office looking for its editor-in-chief and editor
- Setopati · via Google News · Report that three journalists were arrested and at least three more were being sought
- OnlineKhabar English · PM Shah's order to release detained journalists and stop newsroom raids
- DC Nepal · Press adviser Deepa Dahal's statement that the PM's secretariat and office had no involvement or advance knowledge
- DC Nepal · Communications Minister Timilsina's statement on Facebook
- Nepal Press · Minister Timilsina's statement that all journalists were released
- Nepal Press · Bishwamani Subedi's account of being called in for "tea" and his comments after release
Editorial review record
Why it ran today
- ranking judge 1: ranked #1 with 80/100. We ran the raids on October 30. The release, PM Shah's adviser saying he ordered it, Minister Timilsina confirming all were freed, and Press Council saying no warrant was shown are real developments, confirmed by eight or more outlets. Write the plain action and keep the chain of command as attributed claims. Weakest dimension: personal stakes (5).
- ranking judge 2: ranked #1 with 80/100. Confirmed. Our October 30 piece covered only the detentions. Since then come the release, PM Shah's adviser saying he ordered it, Minister Timilsina confirming all were freed, and Press Council saying no warrant was shown, all across eight or more outlets. Weakest dimension: personal stakes (5).
Validation
1 red team round, 2 revisions. Decision: approved.
- accuracy87
- relevance88
- defensibility86
- reach64
Judge 1: The core events are well sourced: the raids, the release, the minister's statement, the Press Council's no-warrant statement and the party condemnations. But the dek invents a three-party count and the card and headline state the PM's order flat. The hook and take also assert the police chief motive and the causation the record hedges. The piece leans on Ratopati, ANI and Annapurna claims nobody could read. One editing pass fixes all of it and lifts personal stakes through the RSP's on-record line about citizens' right to be informed.
Judge 2: The revision log lists judge 2's five edits as still missed, but all five are in version 5. The body now says 'showed no sign of having court permission', Naya Patrika and Diyo Post read 'asking about journalists', RSP is spelled out at first mention with no parentheses, the take opens with the new three sentences, and the caption says 'Subedi told Nepal Press'. A full reread found nothing the revision broke and no new unsourced sentence. Every claim the fetched pages cover matches them, including names, titles, quotes and the attributed chain of command, and the ranking orders to state the plain action and attribute the chain of command are met. The PM's aide and the minister's statements rest on OnlineKhabar English, DC Nepal and Nepal Press, which are not in pages, and web search was unavailable, so they stand as judge 1 accepted them.
The complete record, including the advocate, skeptic, red team and defence arguments, is kept by the newsroom.




Readers' comments
Say what you know. A comment shows once the desk has read it, usually within the hour. A question gets its answer from the story's record.
No comments yet. Be the first.