Mistrikhola River Kills Girl, 6, in Myagdi. Her Cousin, 3, Is Still Missing
A resident blames the Mistrikhola project for an unannounced water release, a plant OnlineKhabar English reported on October 14 had already been shut.
The Mistrikhola river in Myagdi district swept away and killed a six-year-old girl and left her three-year-old cousin missing on Tuesday, October 20, Inspector Bhupendra Gotame of the District Police Office, Myagdi, said, OnlineKhabar and DC Nepal reported.
It happened in Narchyang, part of Annapurna Rural Municipality, where Khabarhub reported that five hydropower plants operate on the Ghalemdi, Mistri, Nilgiri and Rele rivers. That context matters for the families who live and work along these rivers, because a Narchyang resident blamed the Mistrikhola hydropower project's serious negligence for Tuesday's incident, saying it released water from its dam without warning, OnlineKhabar and DC Nepal reported.
The river swept away Anisha Budhamagar, 6, and her three-year-old cousin, as the girls followed their parents, who had gone to gather firewood, Inspector Gotame said. The two girls are cousins, daughters of two sisters, he said. Rescuers recovered Anisha's body. The search for the missing three-year-old continued as of the reports, with the Armed Police Force, Nepal Police and local residents taking part, Gotame said.
Tam Bahadur Chochangi Pun, a Narchyang resident, named the Mistrikhola hydropower project and blamed its serious negligence, OnlineKhabar and DC Nepal reported. He said the river was dry that morning until the project suddenly released water from its dam without any prior notice, sweeping the girls away. Neither report carries a response from the project. Inspector Gotame said police are investigating the incident.
The gap in the story
The project the resident named is the Mistri Khola Hydroelectric Project, a 42 megawatt plant. Its headworks sit about 70 metres downstream of the Nilgiri and Ghalemdi confluence, according to the project's website.
OnlineKhabar English reported on October 14, in a story datelined October 12, that the 42 MW Mistrikhola plant and three other Myagdi plants remained shut after September floods knocked down Dana line towers. No report says whether it had restarted by October 20. Neither Nepali report on the October 20 incident explains what that shutdown means for the dam's gates, or whether a plant that was shut can still release water the way the resident described.
Khabarhub also reported that a separate Narchyang resident, Abin Chochangi, said fish in the Mistri Khola have grown scarce since tunnels began diverting water for the area's hydropower plants, a separate issue from Tuesday's allegation.
What we still do not know
- Has the company that runs the Mistri Khola project, the Nepal Electricity Authority or the Department of Electricity Development responded to the allegation of an unannounced water release.
- Whether the missing three-year-old has been found alive, found dead, or remains unaccounted for since the search described in Tuesday's reports.
- Whether September's flood damage reached the project's dam or intake gates, not just its transmission towers, in a way that could bear on Tuesday's events. The project's operator or the Department of Electricity Development could answer this.
- Whether the project or any plant in the Narchyang cluster runs a downstream warning siren before releasing water, and whether it sounded on Tuesday morning. The operator, the Department of Electricity Development or the Annapurna Rural Municipality ward office could answer this.
What happens next depends on the search for the missing three-year-old and on what the police investigation finds about the resident's account.
Get stories like this every morning
One free email with the day's checked stories, each with what the coverage missed.
Sources
- OnlineKhabar (Nepali) · Primary report naming the dead and missing girls, police attribution and the resident's dam-release allegation naming the Mistrikhola project
- DC Nepal (Nepali) · Corroborating report with identical police quote on the deaths, the search and the resident's allegation naming the Mistrikhola project
- Mountain Energy (project website) · Identifying the Mistri Khola Hydroelectric Project and its location at the Nilgiri Ghalemdi confluence in Narchyang
- Khabarhub (English) · Background on the hydropower cluster around Narchyang and a resident's account of altered river flow
- OnlineKhabar English · Confirming the Mistrikhola plant was shut down since late September after flood damage to transmission towers
Editorial review record
Why it ran today
- ranking judge 1: ranked #1 with 74/100. This meets the breaking bar: a child is dead and a toddler is missing in a search that is still going on. Myagdi police inspector Bhupendra Gotame confirmed it on record, and OnlineKhabar, DC Nepal and Ratopati carry his account, though they echo one police source. The hydropower dam release claim comes from one resident, the project is unnamed, and OnlineKhabar English reported on October 12 that the 42 MW Mistrikhola plant was already shut, so it must be clearly attributed or left out. Weakest reach dimension is share identity.
- ranking judge 2: ranked #1 with 74/100. Confirmed at rank 1. It meets the breaking bar: Myagdi police inspector Bhupendra Gotame said on record that a six year old died and a three year old is still missing, with searches going on. OnlineKhabar, DC Nepal and Ratopati carry his account, but they echo one police source. The resident's dam release claim is unconfirmed, names no project, and sits against OnlineKhabar English's October 12 report that the 42 MW Mistrikhola plant was already shut, so it runs attributed to him only or not at all. Weakest reach dimension is share identity.
What the desk dug up
- Left out. Neither Nepali report names the hydropower project a local resident blames for the sudden water release; public company and energy-industry records identify it as the Mistri Khola Hydroelectric Project (42 MW), owned by Mountain Energy Nepal Ltd, whose headworks sit at the confluence of the Nilgiri and Ghalemdi rivers in Narchyang, Annapurna Rural Municipality-4 — the exact ward where Anisha and Kristika Budhamagar were swept away. [Mountain Energy Nepal Ltd (project website)] [Setopati (English)]
- The numbers. Eight days before the Mistrikhola flash flood, OnlineKhabar's English edition and the Kathmandu Post reported that the 42 MW Mistrikhola plant had been shut down and was not feeding power to the national grid since late September, after floods damaged the Dana-Khurkot transmission towers — a fact that sits unreconciled against the resident's account of a dam "suddenly releasing water" on October 20. [OnlineKhabar English, Oct 12, 2026] [Kathmandu Post, Sept 28, 2026]
- Who benefits. The stretch of river where the children died sits inside what Khabarhub describes as a hydropower cluster of six plants (176 MW) on the Mistri, Nilgiri, Ghalemdi and Rele rivers in the same Narchyang area, where residents have already told reporters that tunnel diversions for these projects have reduced river flows and emptied fish habitat — context that speaks directly to why a riverbed could run dry one moment and surge the next, something neither original report explains. [Khabarhub (English)]
Validation
1 red team round, 2 revisions. Decision: approved.
- accuracy88
- relevance80
- defensibility87
- reach64
Judge 1: The tragedy is solidly attributed to Inspector Gotame. But the piece's investigative frame rests on a false claim that no outlet named the project, when the resident named Mistrikhola and alleged negligence. The flood framing, an invented families line, a hollow disagreement card and naming a missing child also need fixing. All of it is fixable in one pass.
Judge 2: All seven edits ordered after the last ruling are made word for word: the para 4 attribution, 'shut' for 'not running', the October 14 date, the caption's no-response line, the new hook, and key_facts 3 and 4 with the renamed source. A full reread found nothing new that is unsourced, no flat claim where the sources hedge, and no name, date or number that changed. The missing three-year-old stays unnamed and every count is credited to Inspector Gotame. A few small loose ends remain. Key fact 4 places the headworks 'in Narchyang', but the website ties only the powerhouse to the village. 'That context matters for the families' is the desk's own framing. I could not check the October 14 timestamp myself because the fetched page shows no date and search was unavailable, so it rests on the previous ruling. None of these is high severity, and no revisions are left.
The complete record, including the advocate, skeptic, red team and defence arguments, is kept by the newsroom.
Readers' comments
Say what you know. A comment shows once the desk has read it, usually within the hour. A question gets its answer from the story's record.
No comments yet. Be the first.