Nepal WireChecked. Challenged. Then published.

Politics

RSP's Sunar faces scrutiny over circulating audio allegedly carrying abuse, death threat

Police say they have no complaint and the government has ordered no inquiry, while Sunar denies the voice is his and says AI may have been used to fake it.

An editorial illustration of a paused tape recorder and an unanswered phone on a dim desk, symbolizing an unresolved audio allegation and official silence.
Illustration: AI generated with gpt-image-1 for Nepal Wire. Not a photograph.

A circulating audio recording that allegedly features Rastriya Swatantra Party lawmaker Khagendra Sunar hurling obscene abuse at a woman and threatening to kill her son has triggered a party investigation, even though neither the police nor the government has opened one of their own.

In the recording, which media outlets have circulated, a male voice insults a woman in obscene terms, threatens her son and makes degrading, unverified claims about the woman's personal life, OnlineKhabar reported. The speaker also uses sexually abusive language while referring to the woman's alleged associations with political leaders. Sunar denies that the voice is his. In a social media video, he said artificial intelligence or some other method may have been used to imitate his voice and implicate him.

If a woman faces threats like these, the National Women's Commission says she can file a complaint confidentially, without her name made public. Police say they act once a complaint is filed.

The case tests a question that reaches beyond one lawmaker, whether power buys silence when a recording appears to capture threats against a woman. The RSP leads the government, and Sunar is one of its lawmakers, Mohna Ansari, a lawyer and former chairperson of Nepal's National Women's Commission, pointed out. She said authorities cannot stay quiet once such an allegation is public. "If this incident is ignored, it will send a message that powerful people can do whatever they want, emboldening those who engage in such conduct," she told OnlineKhabar.

Nepal Police spokesperson Abhi Narayan Kafle said no one has filed a complaint about the recording. "We have not received a complaint from anywhere regarding this matter. If a complaint is filed, the police will proceed according to the legal process," he told OnlineKhabar. Krishnakumari Paudel Khatiwada, acting chairperson of the National Women's Commission, said the commission has also received no formal complaint.

Sunar's own party has moved faster than the state has. The RSP's Central Disciplinary Commission began collecting evidence on Tuesday, October 13, deputy commission chief Harichandra Bhattarai said. The party has also barred Sunar from formal public events while the matter is examined, OnlineKhabar reported. "We have been collecting evidence since this morning. We will verify the facts and reach a conclusion soon," Bhattarai told OnlineKhabar. RSP parliamentary party whip Prakash Chandra Pariyar said the party will not protect Sunar if the recording is proven genuine. Sunar was in Dang on party business as the commission tried to reach him, OnlineKhabar reported.

In his own video statement, Sunar said he is ready to cooperate with any investigation by the party or the state, and would accept suspension from the party or Parliament if needed, and legal consequences if wrongdoing is proven. "I am ready to answer every question raised by the public," he said. The recording's authenticity, and whether the voice is Sunar's, remains independently unverified.

The earlier warrants

The Surkhet District Court issued an arrest warrant on July 5, 2024, after Sunar was accused of assaulting Dr Sojan Sapkota, chief of Mehelkuna Hospital, and vandalising the building. Police had yet to arrest him in that case, the Kathmandu Post reported on October 27, 2025. The Kavrepalanchok District Court separately issued a warrant against Sunar in an electronic transactions case. The Supreme Court had also issued a show cause order in a contempt case accusing Sunar of verbally abusing High Court judges and vandalising court property, a case that remained pending, the Post reported. Those cases are separate from the current audio allegation and do not prove anything about it. But courts had ordered his arrest before, and police had not acted on at least one of those orders by October 2025, the Post reported. Sunar was not yet a lawmaker at that time. The Post described him then as a Dalit activist.

What we still do not know

  • Whether the Surkhet and Kavrepalanchok warrants against Sunar remain open a year later. Nepal Police headquarters could confirm.
  • Whether the woman linked to the recording and her son have any police protection. Spokesperson Abhi Narayan Kafle or the National Women's Commission could say.
  • When an independent forensic check will establish whether the voice in the recording is Sunar's. The RSP disciplinary commission or police could confirm.
  • Whether the government, as distinct from the party's own inquiry, will open a formal investigation. The Home Ministry or the Speaker's office could answer.

Sources

  1. OnlineKhabar (Nepali) · Original Nepali report on the audio allegations, police and legal experts' response, and Sunar's prior legal cases.
  2. OnlineKhabar (Nepali) · Interview with RSP disciplinary commission deputy chief Harichandra Bhattarai on the evidence review process.
  3. OnlineKhabar English News · English confirmation of police and National Women's Commission statements, RSP's internal inquiry, and Sunar's denial and AI claim.
  4. The Kathmandu Post · Confirmed unexecuted arrest warrant against Sunar from Surkhet court and a pending Supreme Court contempt case.
Editorial review record

Why it ran today

  • ranking judge 1: ranked #3 with 64/100. A sitting MP faces an alleged threat against a woman and her son, with a party inquiry opened and police waiting for a complaint. Multiple outlets confirm this, and the desk has not yet run it. It is writable only as allegation: the audio is unverified, Sunar's AI fabrication denial goes high, and the woman and son stay unidentified. Weakest dimension is personal stakes.
  • ranking judge 2: ranked #3 with 64/100. Confirmed, and not inside politics because this is about alleged conduct toward a private person, not party business. The documented facts are the circulating audio, the party inquiry, the ban on public events, police saying there is no complaint, and Sunar's AI fabrication denial. Write only those. The woman and her son stay unidentified, and the uncorroborated Ratopati rape and bribery complaint stays out. Weakest dimension is personal stakes.

What the desk dug up

  • The record. Parliament's own Hearing Committee had already taken a related, and arguably more serious, complaint against Sunar seriously about a week before the audio leak — including a woman's account to the committee of years of threats and pressure to take her own life with her minor daughter — undercutting the current narrative that state bodies have been silent on allegations against him. [Kathmandu Post] [English Ratopati]
  • The record. Sunar is a sitting lawmaker with multiple arrest warrants and a Supreme Court contempt order already on record — from a 2024 hospital assault case, a Kavre electronic-transactions case, and a contempt case for allegedly abusing High Court judges and vandalizing court property — none of which police have executed in over a year. [Kathmandu Post] [Kathmandu Post]
  • Who benefits. A Parliamentary Hearing Committee complaint filed around the same period alleges Sunar collected more than NPR 100 million domestically and abroad 'in the name of the Dalit movement' and that his associate, ambassador-nominee Giri Bahadur Sunar, managed the funds and brokered a paid police promotion and a paid party list seat — serious public-money allegations that have drawn far less coverage than the audio story. [English Ratopati] [Kathmandu Post]

Validation

1 red team round, 2 revisions. Decision: approved.

  • accuracy88
  • relevance80
  • defensibility87
  • reach62

Judge 1: The core story is sound and carefully attributed. The audio is treated as alleged, Sunar's denial runs high, and the woman and her son stay unidentified as the ranking orders required. Several fixable errors remain: the take misquotes Ansari and states the AI denial flatly, the article gives the audio a circulation date no page carries, and it wrongly attributes the public events ban to Bhattarai. It also calls Sunar a sitting lawmaker as of October 2025, when the Post called him an activist. The card falls short of the format, and the caption never tells the reader what the story changes for them, although the Women's Commission's confidential complaint route gives it that line.

Judge 2: All three edits from the last round are in version 5, even though the log marks them missed. The suspension offer now reads 'if needed'. Paragraph 4 no longer says the woman made an allegation. The bullet no longer says the son is named in the recording. I reread every claim against the OnlineKhabar pages and the 2025 Kathmandu Post page and found nothing broken or newly unsourced. The ranking orders are met: the piece reports only allegations, Sunar's AI denial runs high, the woman and son stay unidentified, and the Ratopati material stays out. Only small style misses remain: the card's second line has four words, and the caption body runs as one block.

The complete record, including the advocate, skeptic, red team and defence arguments, is kept by the newsroom.

#khagendrasunar #rastriyaswatantraparty #nepalpolice #nationalwomenscommission #accountability

Readers' comments

Say what you know. A comment shows once the desk has read it, usually within the hour. A question gets its answer from the story's record.